Free Juniper JN0-692 Exam Dumps Questions & Answers

Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit --
[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group ebgp {
import block-martian;
family inet {
unicast;
}
peer-as 65530;
neighbor 172.22.135.37;
}
[edit]
user@router# show policy-options
policy-statement block-martian {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 0.0.0.0/8 orlonger reject;
route-filter 127.0.0.0/8 orlonger reject;
route-filter 191.255.0.0/16 orlonger reject;
route-filter 192.0.0.0/24 orlonger reject;
route-filter 223.255.255.0/24 orlonger reject;
route-filter 240.0.0.0/4 orlonger reject;
}
}
then reject;
}
[edit]

You have established a peering with an EBGP neighbor, but the peer's 172.0.0.0/8 routes show as hidden.
Referring to the exhibit, what is causing the problem?

• A.  The route-filter used in the import policy is rejecting the 172.0.0.0/8 routes.
• B.  The ebgp group configuration for family inet unicast is causing a route mismatch.
• C.  The ebgp group configuration is missing an export policy needed to accept the routes.
• D.  The import policy is rejecting all routes from the EBGP peer.

You are evaluating a routing policy for an ISP and you find the ^42+ .* (23|9)$ regular expression. Which three AS paths match the regular expression? (Choose three.)

• A.  42 42 42 60 9
• B.  42 69 500 23
• C.  42 42 23 500
• D.  42 42 42 42 9
• E.  42 60 23 9 42

Which two scenarios would explain the error shown in the exhibit? (Choose two.)

• A.  Packets were dropped in the receive path of the peer router.
• B.  The local router egress interface towards the peer was congested.
• C.  The local router received a route withdrawal from the peer.
• D.  Packets were dropped in the receive path of the local router.

R1 and R2 are IS-IS Level 1 routers, but are not forming an adjacency.
Which two reasons would account for this happening? (Choose two.)

• A.  The remote router is configured for both IPv4 and IPv6.
• B.  The remote router is not configured to participate in the same Level 1 area
• C.  The remote router does not have family iso enabled on its interface,
• D.  The remote router does not have family clns enabled on its interface.

Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit -
user@P1# show policy-options policy-statement imp-bgp1 term 1 {
from {
protocol bgp;
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 orlonger;
}
then {
preference 245;
}
}
user@P1# show protocols bgp group IBGP
local-address 172.24.255.1;
family inet {
unicast; } family inet-vpn {
unicast; } cluster 172.24.255.1; peer-as 50; neighbor 172.24.255.3; neighbor 172.24.255.2 {
local-preference 200;
import imp-bgp1; } neighbor 172.24.255.4; -- Exhibit -
The operator of the network shown in the exhibit wants to make 172.24.255.2 the preferred path for routes. However, the router still prefers a different peer.
What is the problem?

• A.  The default protocol preference is less preferred than the preference set in the policy.
• B.  The default protocol preference is more preferred than the preference set in the policy.
• C.  The import policy is setting the protocol preference less preferred than the default.
• D.  The local preference setting is below the default.